Middleweight beltholder Peter Quillin could soon defend his WBO title against promotional stablemate Danny Jacobs.
Hopkins or Dawson? The experts decide
Page 2 of 2
Kevin Iole, Yahoo!Sports
You don't beat Bernard Hopkins without talent and drive. Dawson's size will create some issues, but Bernard will figure him out and pull out a unanimous decision victory.
Mark "Too Sharp" Johnson, former three-time, two-division titleholder
He's left-handed and he's tall. But in Chad's last couple of fights, I haven't really seen that killer instinct in him. I haven't really got the feeling that he wants to finish these guys. He seems almost happy just to be competing.
And when you have a guy in there like Bernard, that was in a situation like I was against Fernando Montiel -- people saying out with the old and in with the new -- it gets you up just that much more. So I think that Bernard has a lot to gain but he also has everything to lose.
I think that Chad Dawson is going to come to fight, but I think Bernard is going to beat him over 12 rounds, by unanimous or split-decision.
Steve Kim, Maxboxing.com
You cannot doubt him or count him out. I like Chad Dawson, who is an incredibly talented boxer and a talented fighter and you can't count him out. But, I think that Bernard has the experience factor, and that's off the hook.
That will lead him to victory because he knows how to nullify an offense of a younger guy as well as his defense. Like when he beat Jean Pascal, who was very, very strong and fast and what have you. But you saw that experience was a factor.
I think that Bernard knows how to break a guy down and that he's a technician. Dawson is a very talented young man, but the age factor does not apply to Bernard Hopkins. So I see Bernard proves to win by a decision.
The optimist in me hopes that during what will likely be many an early staredown and feint-fest, that one man will interpret his foe's tentativeness to attack as an invitation to pressure him.
Aside from the Joe Calzaghe fight, Hopkins eats lefties for lunch, and if Adrian Diaconu can whistle a few right hands down the pipe, I don't see why Bernard can't.
I think the X-Factor is Dawson's decision to switch back to the underrated John Scully in his corner. If Dawson really means it when he said that the reason why he did it was motivation, then we'll see it--or not--in the ring.
Tough fight to call because I foresee a lot of close rounds being fought in spurts on the inside, but I have Hopkins by split decision.
Freddie Roach, trainer of Manny Pacquiao, Amir Khan, and Julio Cesar Chavez Jr.
Because he's a master at taking guys out of their game. I think that he's very likely to do that to Chad Dawson, because Chad Dawson tends to be weak-minded.
Youth with speed, range, and accuracy is a good bet. Throw in the intangible of Hopkins seeming to not want any part of Chad Dawson for a couple of years, and the intrigue increases.
This particular fight is a mental game as much as physical and the chance that we may actually see them thinking, instead of punching, for long stretches is foreboding. If Dawson can let his talent take over, he can potentially dominate this fight.
But that takes a fire he has sometimes lacked since a brutal war with Glen Johnson in their first fight. It says here that Dawson digs deep and finds the fire for this fight, winning a clear decision over Hopkins in fight that turns out, like the Hopkins-Pascal bouts, to be a pleasant surprise action-wise.
I just think that Chad Dawson's speed and athleticism, combined with solid boxing skills, will be too much for the old man this time. Dawson by close but unanimous decision.
Tim Smith, New York Daily News
The experts favor Bernard Hopkins, 12-3, over Chad Dawson.
Photo: Tom Hogan, Hogan Photos/Golden Boy Promotions
Photo: Gene Blevins, Hogan Photos/Golden Boy Promotions
Lem Satterfield can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org